- TEFL Assignment: Analyzing Tenses, Punctuation Usage, and Effective Teacher-Student Communication
- EEE8089 Assignment: Raspberry Pi Network Architecture and Remote Access Configuration
- ILM Unit-409: focused on understanding the impact of development on workplace performance: Managing Personal Development, Coursework, UOS, UK
- ILM Unit-409: focused on implementing and evaluating planned development activities and apply learning in the workplace: Managing Personal Development, Coursework, UOS, UK
- ILM Unit-409: focused on identifying and prioritising work-related development requirements: Managing Personal Development, CourseWork, UOS, UK
- 7PS032: Identify type of study design needed, including within or between groups where relevant: Research Methods Course Work, UOW, UK
- 7PS032: What do the means, range and standard deviations show?: Research Methods Course Work, UOW, UK
- 7PS032: You need to write a research proposal. It must be a quantitative research proposal: Research Methods Course Work, UOW, UK
- MN0493: Report the major points of your discussions with the client. This should include the construction of the portfolios: Investments and Risk Management Course Work, NUN, UK
- DAT7303: In portfolio 3, students must complete 4 tasks related to analysing a dataset using CRISP- DM methodology: Data Mining Course Work, UK
- BUSI 1475: Your task is to identify and select an article from the BBC News website (news.bbc.co.uk): Management in a Critical Context Course Work, UOG, UK
- COMP6029: Computer Science and Electronic Engineering related subjects generally use the IEEE referencing style: Network Systems Course Work, UOS, UK
- UMACTF-15-M: You have recently been appointed as a Financial Analyst for a leading investment bank in London: Corporate Financial Strategy Course Work, UWE, UK
- BAM5010: choose an organisation and make some recommendations for the delivery: Work Based Project Course Work, UOB, UK
- You are required to calculate ratios for Fresh Farms Ltd: financial Course Work, UK
- Understand the legal, ethical and theoretical context for health, safety and risk management: leadership and Management Course Work, UK
- P3 Describe the types of training and development used by a selected business: BTEC Business Extended Diploma Pearson Course Work, UK
- Describe how a selected business identifies training needs: BTEC Business Extended Diploma Pearson Course Work, UK
- Discuss your chosen business, background information and why you have chosen that business: BTEC Business Extended Diploma Pearson Course Work, UK
- Activity 7: Risk management in an organisation should be both sensible and proportionate to the level of risk involved: NEBOSH IDIP ID1 Research Paper Course Work, OU, UK
EG6026 Transport Infrastructure Engineering Assignment 1 Individual Coursework | UOEL
| University | University of East London (UOEL) |
| Subject | EG6026 Transport Infrastructure Engineering |
Individual Coursework
SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE, COMPUTING & ENGINEERING
Submission Instructions
- Submission will be On-line via Turn-it-in/Moodle
| Module code | EG6026 | ||
| Module title | Transport Infrastructure Engineering | ||
| Module leader | Dr Alex Apeagyei | ||
|
Assignment tutors |
Dr Alex Apeagyei & Dr Rasha Mohammad | ||
|
Assignment title |
Individual Coursework | ||
|
Assignment number |
1 | ||
|
Weighting |
100% | ||
|
Handout date |
20 October 2025 | ||
|
Submission date |
18 December 2025 4:00 pm | ||
| Learning outcomes assessed by this assignment | Learning Outcome 1-6 | ||
| Turnitin submission requirement | Yes | Turnitin GradeMark feedback used? | No |
| Grade Book submission used? | No | Grade Book feedback used? | No |
| Other electronic system used? | No | Are submissions / feedback totally electronic? | No |
| Additional information
Internally moderated by |
All contents to be compiled into one file for uploading You may upload as many times as you wish before the deadline
All pages to be numbered sequentially
Dr Meghdad Bagheri Date: 15/09/2025 |
||
Struggling with Your EG6026 Transport Infrastructure Engineering Assignment?
Form of Assessment:
o Individual work
o Group work
For group work assessment which requires members to submit both individual and group work aspects for the assignment, the work should be submitted as:
- Consolidated single document
- Separately by each member
Number of assignment copies required:
1 2 Other
Assignment to be presented in the following format:
On-line submission
Stapled once in the top left-hand corner
Glue bound
Spiral bound
Placed in a A4 ring bound folder (not lever arch)
Note: To students submitting work on A3/A2 boards, work has to be contained in suitable protective case to ensure any damage to work is avoided.
Soft copy:
CD (to be attached to the work in an envelope or purpose made wallet adhered to the rear)
USB (to be attached to the work in an envelope or purpose made wallet adhered to the rear)
Soft copy not required
Note to all students
All work has to be submitted to Module MOODLE.
EG6026 Transport Infrastructure Engineering
Project Brief
A road authority has retained you as the due diligence consultant to advise on traffic and transportation issues relating to proposals for a new estate development in England. The project is aimed at promoting sustainable development and economic growth to reduce poverty. Specifically, you are required to:
- Provide pavement design advice for a new highway to accomodate the anticipated traffic to be generated as result of the new development
- Assess the traffic impact of the proposal on the area, including an evaluation of the capacity of the existing priority T-junction to accommodate the generated traffic
- Assess the pedestrian safety of the existing community near the proposed development and recommend appropriate mitigation measures.
Relevant portions of the Design Manual for Roads and Bridges (DMRB) should be consulted for this assessment. It is expected that completing the coursework evidences achievement of the module learning outcomes (LOs) and also demonstrates alignment with UK-SPEC outcomes needed for CEng/IEng registration. Further additional information and requirements for the new development that could assist you in your assessment are the following:
- Pavement Design (LOs 1, 3, 4, 6) (50%)
A section of West Ham Lane in the Newham borough of London (Figure Q1.1), is to be redesigned as new construction to accommodate increases in vehicle traffic as a result of the rapid development the area is experiencing. Traffic estimates from the Department for Transport ((DfT) for the road section is summarized in Table Q1.1. Design a pavement section based on the DMRB procedures to accomade the given traffic. At a minimum, your solution must include determination:
a. Design traffic in appropriate units (10%)
b. Appropriate foundation class (10%)
c. Pavement thickness assuming a fully flexible conventional pavement (10%)
d. Carbon footbrint of your design in terms of CO2 emissions (10%)
e. Strategies to future-proof your design to address climate change (10%)
For the pavement foundation assume a clayey subgrade with design CBR of 5%.
Use the sample cabon emissons data discussed in class. Assume a pavement design life of 40 years. Use the performance foundation design.
Show all your work in detail so your answer can be checked.

Figure Q1.1 Pavement location map
Table Q1.1. Traffic data for northbound West Ham Lane road in Newham, Lndon
| Latitude | 51.53775 |
| Longitude | 0.005721 |
| link_length_km | 1.0 |
| pedal_cycles | 181 |
| two_wheeled_motor_vehicles | 130 |
| cars_and_taxis | 8976 |
| buses_and_coaches | 690 |
| Lgvs | 1009 |
| hgvs_2_rigid_axle | 212 |
| hgvs_3_rigid_axle | 8 |
| hgvs_4_or_more_rigid_axle | 9 |
| hgvs_4_articulated_axle | 5 |
| hgvs_5_articulated_axle | 8 |
| hgvs_6_articulated_axle | 9 |
- Geometric design (Los 3 and 6) (50%) The major road is an inter-urban road which is expected to have a typically interurban seasonal variation pattern. The traffic information available from the traffic model is the expected 2-way 24-hour AADT on each road for the design year as shown in Figure Q2.1. Turning movements data is as shown in Figure Q2.2. Assume a tidal split with a 60/40 split with the entry flows from the west and south dominant. The geometric features of the existing junction is shown in Table Q2.1. On the basis of the forecasted AADT flows in the design year and accompanying geometric data, determine the:
a. Ratio of flow to capacity (RFC) of each turning stream of traffic and the assumed tidal split of 60/40. Indicate the critical delay per vehicle. (30%)
b. Briefly discuss the adequacy or otherwise of the existing junction to cope with the anticipated traffic due to the new residential. Propose, with justifications, any low cost solution(s) that could be used to address congestion at the junction. The use of roundabouts or traffic signals are not permitted in this instance. (10%)
c. Using the West Ham Lane as case study, provide evidence to support the assertion that that majority of accidents are likely to occur near junctions. State all assumptions and your approach including software used (10%)

Figure Q2.1. Traffic flows at junction.

Figure Q2.2. Turning movement proportions at junction.
Need Expert Help for Your EG6026 Coursework?
Table Q2.1. Geometric details of existing junction
| Width of major carriageway (m) | W | 10.0 |
| Width of central reserve (only for central reserve) (m) | Wcr | 0 |
| The lane width on the major road for traffic waiting to turn right onto minor road (m) | Wc-b | 3.5 |
| Visibility to the right for traffic exiting the minor road turning right (m) | Vrba | 20 |
| Visibility to the left for traffic exiting the minor road turning right (m) | Vlba | 20 |
| Visibility to the right for traffic exiting the minor road turning left (m) | Vrbc | 20 |
| Visibility to the right for traffic exiting the major road turning right onto minor road (m) | Vrcb | 20 |
| Lane width for traffic exiting minor road left (m) | Wb-c | 2.05 |
| Lane width for traffic exiting minor road right (m) | Wb-a | 2.05 |
Submission Requirements
- Work is to be word-processed and this should be in a clear legible typeface.
- All the work must be the student’s own. All written work to be put through ‘Turnitin’ and final report included with submission (maximum similarity index 30%).
- Submissions must be properly structured and professionally presented.
- All figures and tables must be appropriately titled and numbered within the body of the text.
- All pages should be clearly numbered.
- A bibliography and/or any references used must be provided. Referencing to be Harvard Notation (if in doubt, check ‘Cite them Right’).
- Sketches may be in pencil with inked notes or produced by computer.
- Calculations must be logically laid out so that they can be easily checked.
- All work submitted must have a front sheet that clearly shows the student ID, module code and title, module instructor (s), academic term and academic year.
10.The work must be submitted on MOODLE “Turnitin” before the deadline.
11.The file should be names as StudentNumber_FirstName_ExpectedMark%.
12.SUBMISSION DATE : 18 December 2025 4:00 pm
Marking Scheme
| Q1 | 50 | |
| Q2 | 50 | |
| Total | 100 |
Marking Rubric
| Category (Class) | Scale | Mark | Descriptor |
| First | Outstanding | 100 | Work of original, publishable and outstanding quality meriting special recognition by the award of the highest possible mark. |
| Exceptional | 92 | Exceptional work of the highest quality, demonstrating excellent knowledge and understanding, analysis, organisation, accuracy, relevance, presentation and appropriate skills. At final-year level, work may approach a publishable standard. |
|
| 85 | |||
| Excellent | 78 | Very high-quality work demonstrating excellent knowledge and understanding, analysis, organisation, accuracy, relevance, presentation and appropriate skills that may extend existing debates or interpretations. |
|
| 72 | |||
| Upper Second (2.1) | Good | 68 | High quality work showcasing strong knowledge, understanding, analysis, organisation, accuracy, relevance, presentation and appropriate skills. |
| Mid | 65 | ||
| Low | 62 | ||
| Lower Second (2.2) | Good | 58 | Competent work, exhibiting a moderate level of knowledge and understanding, some analysis, organization, accuracy, relevance, presentation, and appropriate skills. |
| Mid | 55 | ||
| Low | 52 | ||
| Third | Good | 48 | Adequate quality work, demonstrating some level of relevant knowledge and understanding that meets learning outcomes. |
| Mid | 45 | ||
| Low | 42 | ||
| Fail | Bare Fail | 38 | Insufficient quality work falling short of the standards expected and does not meet the learning outcomes. While work may indicate some grasp of relevant concepts and techniques, notable omissions and errors are present. |
| Fail | 35 | Poor quality work, significantly below the standard required. Poor knowledge, understanding, serious omissions and errors are present such that learning outcomes are unmet. | |
| 32 | |||
| 20 | Very poor-quality work, well below the standards expected. Contains significant errors or misconceptions in respect of a core issue covered by the assessment, indicating a serious misunderstanding of the assessment topic. Learning outcomes are unmet. | ||
| 12 | Token marks to acknowledge a submission attempt. | ||
| Special Circumstances | Zero | 0 | Absent, work not submitted, wrong work submitted OR penalty in some misconduct cases. |
Want a High-Quality EG6026 Assignment Written to UoEL Standards?
Many UOEL students struggle to complete the EG6026 Transport Infrastructure Engineering coursework because of complex DMRB pavement design, traffic impact analysis, and geometric capacity calculations. If you’re running out of time or finding the calculations and engineering justifications confusing, don’t worry. Diploma Assignment Help provides expert-written, plagiarism-free, 100% human-written Engineering assignment writing service crafted to match University of East London standards. Before placing an order, you can even check our EG6026 sample for quality assurance. Get your custom-written coursework today and secure top grades with confidence.


