EG6026 Transport Infrastructure Engineering Assignment 1 Individual Coursework | UOEL

University University of East London (UOEL)
Subject EG6026 Transport Infrastructure Engineering

Individual Coursework

SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE, COMPUTING & ENGINEERING

Submission Instructions

  • Submission will be On-line via Turn-it-in/Moodle
Module code EG6026
Module title Transport Infrastructure Engineering
Module leader Dr Alex Apeagyei
 

Assignment tutors

Dr Alex Apeagyei & Dr Rasha Mohammad
 

Assignment title

Individual Coursework
 

Assignment number

1
 

Weighting

100%
 

Handout date

20 October 2025
 

Submission date

18 December 2025 4:00 pm
Learning outcomes assessed by this assignment Learning Outcome 1-6
Turnitin submission requirement Yes Turnitin GradeMark feedback used? No
Grade Book submission used? No Grade Book feedback used? No
Other electronic system used? No Are submissions / feedback totally electronic? No
Additional information

 

 

 

 

Internally moderated by

      All contents to be compiled into one file for uploading        You may upload as many times as you wish before the deadline

All pages to be numbered sequentially

 

Dr Meghdad Bagheri

Date: 15/09/2025

Struggling with Your EG6026 Transport Infrastructure Engineering Assignment?

Form of Assessment:

o Individual work
o Group work

For group work assessment which requires members to submit both individual and group work aspects for the assignment, the work should be submitted as:

  1. Consolidated single document
  2. Separately by each member

Number of assignment copies required:

1                            2                   Other

Assignment to be presented in the following format:

On-line submission

Stapled once in the top left-hand corner

Glue bound

Spiral bound

Placed in a A4 ring bound folder (not lever arch)

Note:  To students submitting work on A3/A2 boards, work has to be contained in suitable protective case to ensure any damage to work is avoided.

Soft copy:

CD (to be attached to the work in an envelope or purpose made wallet adhered to the rear)

USB (to be attached to the work in an envelope or purpose made wallet adhered to the rear)

Soft copy not required

Note to all students

All work has to be submitted to Module MOODLE.

EG6026 Transport Infrastructure Engineering

Project Brief

A road authority has retained you as the due diligence consultant to advise on traffic and transportation issues relating to proposals for a new estate development in England. The project is aimed at promoting sustainable development and economic growth to reduce poverty. Specifically, you are required to:

  • Provide pavement design advice for a new highway to accomodate the anticipated traffic to be generated as result of the new development
  • Assess the traffic impact of the proposal on the area, including an evaluation of the capacity of the existing priority T-junction to accommodate the generated traffic
  • Assess the pedestrian safety of the existing community near the proposed development and recommend appropriate mitigation measures.

Relevant portions of the Design Manual for Roads and Bridges (DMRB) should be consulted for this assessment. It is expected that completing the coursework evidences achievement of the module learning outcomes (LOs) and also demonstrates alignment with UK-SPEC outcomes needed for CEng/IEng registration. Further additional information and requirements for the new development that could assist you in your assessment are the following:

  1. Pavement Design (LOs 1, 3, 4, 6) (50%)

A section of West Ham Lane in the Newham borough of London (Figure Q1.1), is to be redesigned as new construction to accommodate increases in vehicle traffic as a result of the rapid development the area is experiencing. Traffic estimates from the Department for Transport ((DfT) for the road section is summarized in Table Q1.1. Design a pavement section based on the DMRB procedures to accomade the given traffic. At a minimum, your solution must include determination:

a. Design traffic in appropriate units (10%)
b. Appropriate foundation class (10%)
c. Pavement thickness assuming a fully flexible conventional pavement (10%)
d. Carbon footbrint of your design in terms of CO2 emissions (10%)
e. Strategies to future-proof your design to address climate change (10%)

For the pavement foundation assume a clayey subgrade with design CBR of 5%.

Use the sample cabon emissons data discussed in class. Assume a pavement design life of 40 years. Use the performance foundation design.

Show all your work in detail so your answer can be checked.

Pavement location map

Figure Q1.1 Pavement location map

Table Q1.1. Traffic data for northbound West Ham Lane road in Newham, Lndon

Latitude 51.53775
Longitude 0.005721
link_length_km 1.0
pedal_cycles 181
two_wheeled_motor_vehicles 130
cars_and_taxis 8976
buses_and_coaches 690
Lgvs 1009
hgvs_2_rigid_axle 212
hgvs_3_rigid_axle 8
hgvs_4_or_more_rigid_axle 9
hgvs_4_articulated_axle 5
hgvs_5_articulated_axle 8
hgvs_6_articulated_axle 9
  1. Geometric design (Los 3 and 6) (50%) The major road is an inter-urban road which is expected to have a typically interurban seasonal variation pattern. The traffic information available from the traffic model is the expected 2-way 24-hour AADT on each road for the design year as shown in Figure Q2.1. Turning movements data is as shown in Figure Q2.2. Assume a tidal split with a 60/40 split with the entry flows from the west and south dominant. The geometric features of the existing junction is shown in Table Q2.1. On the basis of the forecasted AADT flows in the design year and accompanying geometric data, determine the:
    a. Ratio of flow to capacity (RFC) of each turning stream of traffic and the assumed tidal split of 60/40. Indicate the critical delay per vehicle. (30%)
    b. Briefly discuss the adequacy or otherwise of the existing junction to cope with the anticipated traffic due to the new residential. Propose, with justifications, any low cost solution(s) that could be used to address congestion at the junction. The use of roundabouts or traffic signals are not permitted in this instance. (10%)
    c. Using the West Ham Lane as case study, provide evidence to support the assertion that that majority of accidents are likely to occur near junctions. State all assumptions and your approach including software used (10%)

Figure Q2.1. Traffic flows at junction.

Figure Q2.1. Traffic flows at junction.

Figure Q2.2. Turning movement proportions at junction.

Figure Q2.2. Turning movement proportions at junction.

Need Expert Help for Your EG6026 Coursework?

Table Q2.1. Geometric details of existing junction

Width of major carriageway (m) W 10.0
Width of central reserve (only for central reserve) (m) Wcr 0
The lane width on the major road for traffic waiting to turn right onto minor road (m) Wc-b 3.5
Visibility to the right for traffic exiting the minor road turning right (m) Vrba 20
Visibility to the left for traffic exiting the minor road turning right (m) Vlba 20
Visibility to the right for traffic exiting the minor road turning left (m) Vrbc 20
Visibility to the right for traffic exiting the major road turning right onto minor road (m) Vrcb 20
Lane width for traffic exiting minor road left (m) Wb-c 2.05
Lane width for traffic exiting minor road right (m) Wb-a 2.05

Submission Requirements

  1. Work is to be word-processed and this should be in a clear legible typeface.
  2. All the work must be the student’s own. All written work to be put through ‘Turnitin’ and final report included with submission (maximum similarity index 30%).
  3. Submissions must be properly structured and professionally presented.
  4. All figures and tables must be appropriately titled and numbered within the body of the text.
  5. All pages should be clearly numbered.
  6. A bibliography and/or any references used must be provided. Referencing to be Harvard Notation (if in doubt, check ‘Cite them Right’).
  7. Sketches may be in pencil with inked notes or produced by computer.
  8. Calculations must be logically laid out so that they can be easily checked.
  9. All work submitted must have a front sheet that clearly shows the student ID, module code and title, module instructor (s), academic term and academic year.

10.The work must be submitted on MOODLE “Turnitin” before the deadline.

11.The file should be names as StudentNumber_FirstName_ExpectedMark%.

12.SUBMISSION DATE  :   18 December 2025  4:00 pm

Marking Scheme

Q1 50
Q2 50
Total 100

Marking Rubric

Category (Class) Scale Mark Descriptor
First Outstanding 100 Work of original, publishable and outstanding quality meriting special recognition by the award of the highest possible mark.
Exceptional 92 Exceptional work of the highest quality, demonstrating excellent
knowledge and understanding, analysis, organisation, accuracy,
relevance, presentation and appropriate skills. At final-year
level, work may approach a publishable standard.
85
Excellent 78 Very high-quality work demonstrating excellent knowledge and
understanding, analysis, organisation, accuracy, relevance,
presentation and appropriate skills that may extend existing
debates or interpretations.
72
Upper Second (2.1) Good 68 High quality work showcasing strong knowledge,
understanding, analysis, organisation, accuracy, relevance,
presentation and appropriate skills.
Mid 65
Low 62
Lower Second (2.2) Good 58 Competent work, exhibiting a moderate level of knowledge
and understanding, some analysis, organization, accuracy,
relevance, presentation, and appropriate skills.
Mid 55
Low 52
Third Good 48 Adequate quality work, demonstrating some level of relevant knowledge and understanding that meets learning outcomes.
Mid 45
Low 42
Fail Bare Fail 38 Insufficient quality work falling short of the standards expected and does not meet the learning outcomes. While work may indicate some grasp of relevant concepts and techniques, notable omissions and errors are present.
Fail 35 Poor quality work, significantly below the standard required. Poor knowledge, understanding, serious omissions and errors are present such that learning outcomes are unmet.
32
20 Very poor-quality work, well below the standards expected. Contains significant errors or misconceptions in respect of a core issue covered by the assessment, indicating a serious misunderstanding of the assessment topic. Learning outcomes are unmet.
12 Token marks to acknowledge a submission attempt.
Special Circumstances Zero 0 Absent, work not submitted, wrong work submitted OR penalty in some misconduct cases.

Want a High-Quality EG6026 Assignment Written to UoEL Standards?

Many UOEL students struggle to complete the EG6026 Transport Infrastructure Engineering coursework because of complex DMRB pavement design, traffic impact analysis, and geometric capacity calculations. If you’re running out of time or finding the calculations and engineering justifications confusing, don’t worry. Diploma Assignment Help provides expert-written, plagiarism-free, 100% human-written Engineering assignment writing service crafted to match University of East London standards. Before placing an order, you can even check our EG6026 sample for quality assurance. Get your custom-written coursework today and secure top grades with confidence.

Answer

Do You Need Assignment of This Question

WhatsApp Icon

Facing Issues with Assignments? Talk to Our Experts Now!Download Our App Now!

Have Questions About Our Services?
Download Our App!

Get the App Today!

QRcode