- CIPD Unit 5CO01 Organisational Performance and Culture in Practice Learner Assessment Brief 2025/26
- ATHE Level 3 Unit 2 How Businesses and Organisations Work Assignment | LCPS
- Unit 531 Principles of Professional Coaching Assessment Brief | SBTL
- PSY4011 Developmental Psychology Assessment Brief – Identity Development in Childhood
- MBA7066 Innovation and Entreprenuership Assignment Brief 2024-2025 | University of Greater Manchester
- Unit 17 Caring for Individuals with Dementia BTEC Level 3 Assignment Brief Case Study
- BTEC Level 3 Unit 15 Care for Individuals with Dementia Assessment
- Unit 3: Professional Practice Authorised Assignment Brief 2025–2026, ESOFT Metro Campus
- Unit 7 Leadership & Management People Assignment – Level 3 Diploma in Business and Management
- HNC Civil Engineering Assignment 2 The Construction Environment
- HNC Civil Engineering Assignment 1 Geotechnics & Soil Mechanics Academic Year 24/25
- UNIT CMI 519 Managing Quality and Continuous Improvement Assessment Brief
- Level 5 in Leadership and Management in Adult Care – Governance and Regulatory Process in Adult Care and Decision Making in Adult Care
- BTM6GSM Global Strategic Management Level 6 Assignment 1 Case Study
- Level 5 in Leadership and Management in Adult Care – Supervising Others and Facilitate Coaching and Mentoring of Practitioners in Care Settings
- Unit 2 Marketing Processes and Planning Assignment Brief 2025-2026
- Unit 805 Strategic Communication Assignment Brief- Media Impact on International Organisations
- UNIT CMI 513 Managing Projects to Achieve Results Assessment Brief
- AFM5CGL Level 5 Corporate Governance and leadership Assignment Case Study
- Law, Policy and Ethical Practice in Health and Social Care Assignment 2025-2026
In the present research, we test Eddington’s claim that the arrow of time is “insisted on by our reasoning faculty: Psychology Assignment, UO, UK
| University | University of Oxford (UO) |
| Subject | Psychology |
Questions
- In the present research, we test Eddington’s claim that the arrow of time is “insisted on by our reasoning faculty” and that reversing it would “render the external world nonsensical” (Eddington, 1928/2012, pp 69)
- We explored whether violating the expectation that entropy evolves from low to high and thus into the future (e.g., a glass falling, hitting the floor, and breaking into shards) causes an increase in perceived duration.
- We presented animations of computer-generated novel 3D animated shapes, which either evolve from wholes into parts (low to high entropy) or from parts into wholes (high to low entropy).
- Given these studies showing the effect of violations of expectation on duration perception, we reasoned that if entropy is one of the factors used by the human nervous system to determine the temporal orientation (i.e., the direction of the past from the future), violations of the second law of thermodynamics (the expected direction of entropy from low to high) will result in an overestimation of perceived duration.
- In our experiments, we used the psychophysical method of stimulus duration reproduction, and we limited ourselves to immediate duration reproduction (that is, at the offset of the stimulus) and the 500ms – 2000ms range, as longer durations most likely involve processes beyond sensory and short-term memory
Do You Need Assignment of This Question
Need assistance with your Psychology Assignment at the University of Oxford (UO), UK? Look no further! Our expert team is here to provide top-notch Research Paper Writing Service and reliable Assignment Writing Help for your course. Test Eddington’s claim on the arrow of time “insisted on by our reasoning faculty” with the guidance of our skilled professionals. Pay our experts and excel in your course today! UK students can now access the support they need to succeed in their academic journey
Answer


